<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t take government money, says Jan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.createdinbirmingham.com/2007/10/28/dont-take-government-money-says-jan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.createdinbirmingham.com/2007/10/28/dont-take-government-money-says-jan/</link>
	<description>Linking up Birmingham&#039;s Artistic and Creative Communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:58:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jan bowman</title>
		<link>http://www.createdinbirmingham.com/2007/10/28/dont-take-government-money-says-jan/comment-page-1/#comment-3119</link>
		<dc:creator>jan bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.createdinbirmingham.com/?p=955#comment-3119</guid>
		<description>True, but I didn&#039;t say it was. I said on the Spiked piece: 
&quot;...Artists have always had to work around their patronsâ€™ whims and political agendas. However, New Labourâ€™s social agenda is more intrusive than the most autocratic client could ever be. In the twenty-first century, the British state has unprecedented power to intrude into our personal lives, and does so in subtle and pervasive ways. We have anti-social behaviour orders (ASBOs) - allowing people to be locked-up for non-criminal behaviour; the ubiquity of closed-circuit television (CCTV), which seems to be omnipresent â€˜for our safetyâ€™; smoking bans; lunchbox inspections; police checks on all adults working with children; mentoring programmes for prospective parents; and jail terms for saying the wrong thing in public - all in the name of â€˜supporting the communityâ€™...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but I didn&#8217;t say it was. I said on the Spiked piece:<br />
&#8220;&#8230;Artists have always had to work around their patronsâ€™ whims and political agendas. However, New Labourâ€™s social agenda is more intrusive than the most autocratic client could ever be. In the twenty-first century, the British state has unprecedented power to intrude into our personal lives, and does so in subtle and pervasive ways. We have anti-social behaviour orders (ASBOs) &#8211; allowing people to be locked-up for non-criminal behaviour; the ubiquity of closed-circuit television (CCTV), which seems to be omnipresent â€˜for our safetyâ€™; smoking bans; lunchbox inspections; police checks on all adults working with children; mentoring programmes for prospective parents; and jail terms for saying the wrong thing in public &#8211; all in the name of â€˜supporting the communityâ€™&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.createdinbirmingham.com/2007/10/28/dont-take-government-money-says-jan/comment-page-1/#comment-2998</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.createdinbirmingham.com/?p=955#comment-2998</guid>
		<description>Valid point, but is subjectivity to commercial interests instead a genuinely independent alternative? There has never been model for sustaining artists within Capitalism which has been genuinely free from ideological subjectivity of some kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valid point, but is subjectivity to commercial interests instead a genuinely independent alternative? There has never been model for sustaining artists within Capitalism which has been genuinely free from ideological subjectivity of some kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
